I used to admire novelists when I was young.
At that time, there was something called "self-publishing" in the form of publishing.
As the name suggests, the cost of publication is borne by the author himself.
By the way, I have never self-published.
I have no intention of denying this form or saying it is a scam like the one on the internet.
In fact, Yusuke Yamada's "Real Kigoko" has been a huge hit since it was self-published.
I believe that it is the responsibility of the author to not hit, and the publisher is not responsible.
However, it is questionable whether there is some guarantee of the quality of the work.
Recently, I bought something that looked like self-publishing, but there was a work that wrote "each one" as "each one".
Honestly, the sentence itself was so subtle that I lost the mood to read it in 1P.
Personally, I feel that this may be detrimental to the user and lead to the departure of the novel.
Self-publishing has the merit of spotlighting masterpieces that are not originally available in the world.
Low levels can be unfortunate for the author and the user who made the purchase.
I think that the quality of the work is necessary to some extent.
Personally, I think kindle is good if you have some knowledge of the web.
If possible, I would prefer a fairly low price or free in the beginning.
E-books are already becoming commonplace.You don't have to force it out on paper.
If you can develop a website, why not publish it on your own website (homepage) or on a popular novel posting site?
I will be a manga artist, but "one" is the one who was hit by it, and it is laying the foundation for a good work to be hit.
If you stick to paper, you can get feedback using the above method, and if you have some skill, you can consider self-publishing.
If you don't receive feedback, I think it is the same for web development to be a selfish work.
How about self-publishing your work after being seen and evaluated by others?
At that time, there was something called "self-publishing" in the form of publishing.
As the name suggests, the cost of publication is borne by the author himself.
By the way, I have never self-published.
I have no intention of denying this form or saying it is a scam like the one on the internet.
In fact, Yusuke Yamada's "Real Kigoko" has been a huge hit since it was self-published.
I believe that it is the responsibility of the author to not hit, and the publisher is not responsible.
However, it is questionable whether there is some guarantee of the quality of the work.
Recently, I bought something that looked like self-publishing, but there was a work that wrote "each one" as "each one".
Honestly, the sentence itself was so subtle that I lost the mood to read it in 1P.
Personally, I feel that this may be detrimental to the user and lead to the departure of the novel.
Self-publishing has the merit of spotlighting masterpieces that are not originally available in the world.
Low levels can be unfortunate for the author and the user who made the purchase.
I think that the quality of the work is necessary to some extent.
Personally, I think kindle is good if you have some knowledge of the web.
If possible, I would prefer a fairly low price or free in the beginning.
E-books are already becoming commonplace.You don't have to force it out on paper.
If you can develop a website, why not publish it on your own website (homepage) or on a popular novel posting site?
I will be a manga artist, but "one" is the one who was hit by it, and it is laying the foundation for a good work to be hit.
If you stick to paper, you can get feedback using the above method, and if you have some skill, you can consider self-publishing.
If you don't receive feedback, I think it is the same for web development to be a selfish work.
How about self-publishing your work after being seen and evaluated by others?
